UK Parliament / Open data

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

Proceeding contribution from Paul Farrelly (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 11 September 2017. It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.

The Bill asks us to transfer to the Executive what the hon. Gentleman considers a flaw without this Parliament having much of a say in what

may happen. There are good reasons to oppose the Bill on the basis of clause 9 and the lack of a meaningful vote in Parliament—the Bill would allow the Government to get around that.

To continue the school metaphor, the Bill is not only unsatisfactory and in need of improvement, but wholly inadequate. The Government need to go back to the drawing board and rethink their approach. There is no mandate for a hard, cliff-edge Brexit or for shredding long-won relationships with the other 27 countries of the European Union, nor is there a mandate for a hard transition. There is certainly no mandate to hand the powers in the Bill to a minority Government and a caretaker Prime Minister. I hope that my colleagues and concerned Members on both sides of the House will vote against the Bill. Not to do so would give the Government a strong signal that they can get away with anything they like.

9.1 pm

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

628 cc540-1 

Session

2017-19

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top