Forgive me; I will make some progress. The exact use of the power will, of course, depend on the contents of the withdrawal agreement. For example, a power could, depending on what the withdrawal agreement says, be used to clarify the status of UK cases at the CJEU that started before exit but will not yet be concluded on exit day. It could also be used, for example, to enable regulatory approval for UK products that was pending at the point of exit. It will align with the proposals set out this summer in the UK’s position paper on continuity in the availability of goods in the EU and the UK. Those sorts of fairly technical but important issues need to be capable of being changed.
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Davis
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 September 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
628 c352 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-14 15:14:35 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-07/17090743000113
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-07/17090743000113
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-07/17090743000113