The first thing I would say is that eight days is quite a long time for this sort of thing. Perhaps the most relevant comparison is with the Lisbon treaty, which recreated—[Interruption.] Yes, it is, because it recreated the European law on a major basis. This Bill does not do that. It does not aim to change law, with a tiny exception that I will come back to; it aims to maintain the laws that we currently have—it is primarily technical in that respect. If the hon. Gentleman sees it as being any different, then I will give way to him again.
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
David Davis
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 September 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
628 c346 Session
2017-19Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-14 15:14:30 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-07/17090743000054
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-07/17090743000054
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-09-07/17090743000054