UK Parliament / Open data

Higher Education and Research Bill

Proceeding contribution from Natascha Engel (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 26 April 2017. It occurred during Debate on bills on Higher Education and Research Bill.

I must draw the House’s attention to the fact that financial privilege is engaged by Lords amendments 23, 138 and 139. If agreed by the House, I will cause an appropriate entry to be made in the Journal. I also remind the House that certain of the motions relating to the Lords amendments will be certified as relating exclusively to England and Wales, as set out on the selection paper. If the House divides on any certified motion, a double majority will be required for the motion to be passed. I also alert Members to the fact that an additional paper has been published today containing three additional motions to disagree to Lords amendments 183, 184 and 185. I am sure that the Minister will explain this further to the House. The first motion to be taken is to disagree with the Lords in their amendment 1, with which it will be convenient to consider the other motions and amendments as on the selection paper. I call the Minister to move to disagree with Lords amendment 1.

3.29 pm

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

624 c1158 

Session

2016-17

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top