I think the best thing to say is that there is a mixed economy among local authorities. Some do very well—some have to do very well because of the pressures on them—and others do less well. Part of the Bill’s purpose is to bring them all up to the same standard. However, the hon. Gentleman’s point cuts both ways. If it is true that Camden Council, for example, is already preventing 80% of those who present themselves from becoming homeless, the savings that are likely to be made—most of which, I understand, will result from an increase in prevention work, which will avoid the need to find alternative accommodation or fund the costs of homelessness in other ways—will be less. The Government rather piously hope that after two years there will be no need for funding, but I do not think anyone believes that, including the Government.
Homelessness Reduction Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Andy Slaughter
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 27 January 2017.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Homelessness Reduction Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
620 c557 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-10-12 11:14:22 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-27/17012792000057
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-27/17012792000057
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2017-01-27/17012792000057