I hope that my hon. Friend will understand that it would be pre-emptive of me to make such a commitment at this stage. However, we have been clear that we think that credit unions have a big role to play. The primary legislation does not preclude them from being part of a multiple provider model in future. Indeed, my officials have been in constructive discussions with the credit union movement throughout the passage of the Bill. We are working with the credit union sector to ensure that the final design of Help to Save meets the needs of the target audience. I know that the Economic Secretary to the Treasury is looking forward to meeting the hon. Member for Harrow West and my hon. Friend the Member for South Ribble (Seema Kennedy) to discuss the issue further with the Association of British Credit Unions. Therefore, this is not about excluding the credit union movement. We are in regular, constructive discussion with credit unions. We just feel at this stage that the amendment would not allow us to offer that simple nationwide model on the introduction of Help to Save.
Savings (Government Contributions) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Jane Ellison
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 12 December 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Savings (Government Contributions) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
618 c550 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-09-15 15:03:16 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-12/16121235000071
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-12/16121235000071
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-12-12/16121235000071