I take very much the point my hon. Friend makes, and it is symptomatic of the change in the character of large parts of our country and particularly, for the purposes of this debate, of London. There is now a much increased number of members of the Muslim faith, for example, living in the United Kingdom. However, that is surely an argument for the local authority to facilitate the making available of more land to meet the religious needs of this very important part of the community, rather than an argument for saying, “We are so short of land that we are going to reuse the graves of those who were previously buried in the New Southgate cemetery.” I can understand why the Bill is being promoted, but I cannot understand why a sensitive local authority would not help to provide more land.
New Southgate Cemetery [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Christopher Chope
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 November 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on New Southgate Cemetery [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
617 c1484 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-02-05 09:54:19 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-29/16112932000282
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-29/16112932000282
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-29/16112932000282