My hon. Friend will not be surprised that I expressed some degree of sympathy with amendment 2, given that I raised some of these points. I am reassured about the extension of contactless payments, particularly to Oyster cards, as was mentioned from the Opposition Front Bench. However, I do not support the amendment because of its wording. It refers to “comparable method”. The shadow Minister used the word “similar”, and my hon. Friend the Minister used the term “unspecified”. That is all unclear. There will be further technological changes and we will probably look back and say, “Wasn’t there a formulation that we could have used to include this new technology?” The wording of the amendment is not satisfactory and unfortunately I cannot offer a suggestion to improve it.
Small Charitable Donations and Childcare Payments Bill
Proceeding contribution from
James Duddridge
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 15 November 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Small Charitable Donations and Childcare Payments Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
617 c198 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-15 16:35:47 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-15/16111526001937
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-15/16111526001937
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-11-15/16111526001937