We spent most of yesterday discussing the political and military miscalculation and misadventure in Iraq. We hope a debate on Trident looms large, but the report emphasises the need to consider the cost-effectiveness, desirability and affordability of the Successor programme. In the light of Brexit and the financial uncertainty it might bring, does the right hon. Gentleman agree that there are many approaches and non-nuclear deterrents we could introduce to create stability with Russia, but that Trident skews every single defence budget to unacceptable levels? Its extension could lead to a financial miscalculation and to a military misadventure that would make Iraq look like a bit of a walk in the park.
Russia: Implications for UK Defence and Security
Proceeding contribution from
Douglas Chapman
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 July 2016.
It occurred during Select Committee statement on Russia: Implications for UK Defence and Security.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
612 c1061 Session
2016-17Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-02-17 09:49:45 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-07-07/16070729000032
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-07-07/16070729000032
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-07-07/16070729000032