I think that the Treasury is right, in this instance, not to change the name. The Bank of England has a brand. I do not need to give a history lesson to the nationalist Members, but the Bank of England was founded in 1694, which was before the 1707 and 1800 Acts of Union that might—for two of the three other parts of the United Kingdom, at least—otherwise have had an impact on its initial name. Its brand is important, and I hope that those from the other parts of the United Kingdom will not feel as though their interests are being downgraded simply because they do not appear in the headline name, not least for the reasons that have been set out. It is important that we recognise that the Bank acts for the entirety of the United Kingdom, and that it therefore pays great attention to the voices of those in all parts of the United Kingdom, not just England.
Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Field
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 19 April 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
608 c811 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-03-22 11:15:28 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-19/16041934000055
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-19/16041934000055
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-04-19/16041934000055