Let me explain the position to the hon. Gentleman, to whom I am genuinely grateful for his point of order, and for the benefit of the House. There is nothing disorderly in the Minister giving an indication of how the Government would propose to proceed. If a Minister wishes to say to the House, “Our intention is to proceed with pilots”, it is perfectly in order for the Minister to do that. But of one thing, procedurally and constitutionally, the House needs to be made again aware: Members are voting on that which is on the paper and which the Speaker has selected. Members are not voting on a Government proposal or words about pilots; they are voting on that which is on the paper. The matter under discussion is the amendment standing in the name of the hon. Member for Enfield, Southgate (Mr Burrowes). We are voting on that, not on a Government proposal, and I hope that that is clear.
Enterprise Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
John Bercow
(Speaker)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 9 March 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) on Enterprise Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
607 c338 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2017-03-22 11:16:27 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-09/16030943000605
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-09/16030943000605
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-03-09/16030943000605