At the conclusion of her speech, the Minister indicated that by voting against the Second Reading of this Bill Members would be putting the public at risk from further bank abuses. Does the hon. Gentleman not agree that, by voting against this Bill and getting it changed so that the reverse burden of proof is put back in place, we are safeguarding against the abuses of the past?
Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Sammy Wilson
(Democratic Unionist Party)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 1 February 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c662Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-15 15:19:42 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/1602018000313
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/1602018000313
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/1602018000313