The hon. Gentleman is making an extraordinarily intelligent speech, but he has just hit on the key point. It is possible for bankers to provide a tick-box operation, which their lawyers have advised them on, to prove that they have undertaken every possible measure to prevent such action. It is therefore very easy for them to get around the reverse burden of proof legislation. The point behind reversing that legislation, which was given by Andrew Bailey and by the Governor of the Bank of England and some of the Bank’s lawyers, is that there cannot be a tick-box operation to show that they have complied with the rules because they involve a much more esoteric way of running the bank. It is therefore much more difficult for bankers to escape the rules if something does go wrong.
Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Mark Garnier
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 1 February 2016.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Bank of England and Financial Services Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
605 c672 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-15 15:19:45 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/16020121000045
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/16020121000045
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2016-02-01/16020121000045