I certainly understand the hon. Lady’s point on behalf of her constituent, but will she recognise that the independent reviewer specifically considered the issue and concluded that extending the scope of the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 to cover consequential losses would be a step too far currently and might leave the door open for far greater liabilities?
Riot Compensation Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mike Wood
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 4 December 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Riot Compensation Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
603 c621 Session
2015-16Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-11-04 13:31:01 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-04/15120444000172
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-04/15120444000172
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-04/15120444000172