Okay, let us have that argument. The reason I specified 12 months is that I think it is a realistic timetable for concretising the plans that TfL and the Mayor have for a site, so that they are more focused on being absolutely clear about what is imminent. I agree that it would be good to have a longer-term plan, but I think that 12 months is more realistic, given that the Mayor has a five-year period in office.
Transport for London Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
John McDonnell
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 16 March 2015.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Transport for London Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
594 c576Session
2014-15Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2016-12-22 16:39:53 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-16/15031631000036
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-16/15031631000036
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-03-16/15031631000036