I was initially reluctant to interrupt the right hon. Gentleman while the compliments were flowing from the Treasury Bench, but normal service has now been resumed. The major difference between the scheme that he is promulgating and that which we are proposing—I reiterate this for the avoidance of any doubt—is that while the Government are proposing work experience, we are talking about real jobs. The advantage of work experience cannot be denied, but the aim of our proposal is proper, permanent jobs. If they turn out not to be permanent jobs that people start with it, so be it, but the difference is between permanence and work experience.
Compulsory Jobs Guarantee
Proceeding contribution from
Stephen Pound
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 February 2015.
It occurred during Opposition day on Compulsory Jobs Guarantee.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
592 c817 Session
2014-15Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2022-08-30 18:24:49 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-11/15021193000200
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-11/15021193000200
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-02-11/15021193000200