In a fit of enthusiasm earlier this evening, I voted with the right hon. Member for Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford (Yvette Cooper) and the Labour party along with a rather distinguished collection of rebels from at least two diametrically opposed positions on Europe and from at least four different political parties. That was because we all shared her frustration at the outcome of the procedural shenanigans that have landed us in this situation in which we are voting on only 11 of the 35 justice and home affairs measures, and not specifically the European arrest warrant, which is the very one that we all wanted to debate and vote on. Now, the right hon. Lady has got a bit carried away. I cannot see any earthly reason, however frustrated we all are with the situation, for not voting on the 11 that we all agree on. There is no logic to that whatever. What justification is there for not voting on co-operation between asset recovery offices of the member states in the field of tracing the proceeds of crime? That is something on which we all agree.
Criminal Law
Proceeding contribution from
Martin Horwood
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 November 2014.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Criminal Law.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
587 c1256 Session
2014-15Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2015-05-22 05:54:33 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-10/14111034000028
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-10/14111034000028
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-11-10/14111034000028