My hon. Friend says that the scheme applies if there are no more than three flats in the building. Where we lived—the current residents now have the problem—there could be 12, 16 or 20 properties. These are small properties that tend to be more affordable and occupied by those with a mortgage. Residents have put it to me that the increases are unaffordable already. Insurance companies are extracting those increases from them when they renew their insurance policies in an area that they know has already been flooded at ground-floor level because of the properties’ proximity to the river. I urge the Government to revisit this, because it is not acceptable. I do not want to pander to the Opposition’s argument about the standard cost of living, because that would be inappropriate, but I do believe that the Government should make the insurance affordable by reducing the cost. They should take out the below-three number because they have to reflect what working families are living in.
Water Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 7 May 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Water Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
580 c186 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-10-05 21:17:39 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-05-07/14050791000462
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-05-07/14050791000462
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-05-07/14050791000462