I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for mentioning that outstanding company in my constituency. Dyson now employs some 1,500 designers and does groundbreaking design work in Britain. I am also grateful to the hon. Gentleman and the Opposition for agreeing to table the amendment. The word “intentional” should be included in clause 13, but will he explain why amendment 2, which removes insignificant changes from the exemption, makes any sense at all?
Intellectual Property Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
James Gray
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 12 March 2014.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Intellectual Property Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
577 c326 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-15 17:22:40 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-03-12/14031264000075
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-03-12/14031264000075
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2014-03-12/14031264000075