Of course, one of the problems is that whoever undertakes the supervision activity will have to meet the requirements imposed by a sentencing court, which will be predetermined and come with an element of unbreakable cost. Is it not, therefore, something of a distortion to suggest that these are payment-by-results contracts when a substantial proportion of the cost will, in effect, be determined by the sentence passed by the court? Surely the Justice Secretary could tell us now what costing he has made of that.
Offender Rehabilitation Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Kate Green
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 11 November 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Offender Rehabilitation Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
570 c677 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-27 16:09:15 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-11/1311119000107
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-11/1311119000107
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-11/1311119000107