No, that is not my point. My point is that we are going into a wholesale rearrangement of the public probation service—a service that has existed to manage the totality of risk, and take overall responsibility for it. That is what is being broken up. It is extremely important that we do not go down that track without proper parliamentary scrutiny of the implications and consequences, and that scrutiny is what clause 1 seeks to achieve.
Offender Rehabilitation Bill [Lords]
Proceeding contribution from
Kate Green
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 11 November 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Offender Rehabilitation Bill [Lords].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
570 c707 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2021-10-27 16:09:23 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-11/13111128000093
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-11/13111128000093
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-11-11/13111128000093