I understand what the Minister is saying, but as it stands clause 121 says that there can be a switch to a different supplier or different terms, “unless the customer objects”. The customer can always come back and say, “No, I don’t want to do that”; even though the company is saying, “This is a better tariff for you”, the customer still has the ability to do that. The difficulty with including subsection 3(e)(ii) is that, as the regulatory impact assessment said, very many customers never get round to switching and do not react when they are given offers or told a better deal is available. Leaving that provision in would allow companies simply to offer customers these things but not push them forward.
Energy Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Mike Weir
(Scottish National Party)
in the House of Commons on Monday, 3 June 2013.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Energy Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
563 c1277 Session
2013-14Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2020-04-16 10:15:10 +0100
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-03/13060311000545
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-03/13060311000545
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2013-06-03/13060311000545