The hon. Gentleman makes a tremendous intervention, because he is actually arguing our point: the proposals are bad for business. We would accept the Underhill review’s proposal to make the employment tribunal better and we would accept, with minor amendments, the ACAS proposal for early conciliation, but to put in place a compensated, no-fault-dismissal-cum-protected-conversation system would be bad for business. The hon. Gentleman must also realise that the Business Department’s own small business survey showed that only 6% of businesses listed regulation as a concern. That included all regulation, so employment regulation was only a minor part of it. He can shake his head, but that is what BIS’s own impact assessment says.
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Ian Murray
(Labour)
in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 17 October 2012.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
551 c351 Session
2012-13Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-11-26 10:01:23 +0000
URI
http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-10-17/12101758000449
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-10-17/12101758000449
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://hansard.intranet.data.parliament.uk/Commons/2012-10-17/12101758000449