Superannuation Bill. Programme motion relating to consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed on question. Consideration of Lords amendments. Commons amendment to Lords amendment 6 debated and negatived on division (225 votes to 313). Lords amendments 1 to 7 agreed to.
Superannuation Bill
About these Parliamentary proceedings
Reference
520 c837-58Session
2010-12Legislative stage
Lords amendmentsChamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberRelated items
Superannuation Bill. Lords amendments. Explanatory notes also published (Bill 123-EN).
Tuesday, 7 December 2010
Bills
House of Commons
Tuesday, 7 December 2010
Bills
House of Commons
Proceeding contributions
Liam Byrne | 520 c840-1 (Link to this contribution)
May I start by expressing my gratitude to the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General ...
John Hemming | 520 c841-2 (Link to this contribution)
It is rather sad that, again, there are relatively few people in the Gallery when we are debating su...
Show all contributions (33)
John McDonnell | 520 c842-3 (Link to this contribution)
Lords amendment 1 requires the Government to consult with the aim of seeking agreement, and provides...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c843 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman refers to a report of that meeting, but I can give him another account, because I...
John McDonnell | 520 c843-6 (Link to this contribution)
My understanding is that on 11 October, PCS and POA tried to explore with the Minister opportunities...
Lord Dodds of Duncairn | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution)
I have listened to the debate with great interest, particularly on the consultation with the POA, PC...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution)
The right hon. Gentleman raises a good point, which is that it is by no means true that all civil se...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c838-40 (Link to this contribution)
When I opened the debate on Second Reading in September, I set out—at some length, I regret to say—t...
Speaker | 520 c838 (Link to this contribution)
With this we may take Lords amendments 2, 3 and 7.
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c838 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.
John McDonnell | 520 c854 (Link to this contribution)
Could we clarify what the Minister has just said? Is the provision he supports simply a device to be...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c854 (Link to this contribution)
I shall be clear: both sides of the House have accepted that the current scheme is unsustainable and...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c853-4 (Link to this contribution)
The right hon. Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne) asked why we needed to keep the caps at ...
Liam Byrne | 520 c852-3 (Link to this contribution)
I want to speak briefly about Lords amendments 4, 5 and 6, as well as amendment (a), tabled by my ho...
Speaker | 520 c851 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman will be able to move his amendment formally later.
John McDonnell | 520 c851 (Link to this contribution)
The House needs to be aware of what this measure actually means, and I make it clear that I will pre...
John Hemming | 520 c852 (Link to this contribution)
As someone who interests himself in procedural issues, perhaps I could think of the clause as being ...
John McDonnell | 520 c851-2 (Link to this contribution)
Thank you very much for that advice, Mr Deputy Speaker. I get confused when we are talking about sun...
Speaker | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution)
All the Lords amendments engage the financial privilege of the House. If they are agreed to, the app...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c850 (Link to this contribution)
I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 4.
Speaker | 520 c850 (Link to this contribution)
With this we may take Lords amendments 5 and 6 and amendment (a) thereto.
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c850-1 (Link to this contribution)
The amendments respond to concerns raised by Opposition Members on Second Reading in the other place...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution)
Those are not concerns that have just arisen; they have been there throughout. I have been forthrigh...
John McDonnell | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution)
I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. Let me quote to him his statement to the House on 30 O...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution)
The hon. Gentleman talks as if this were a trifling consideration, but it is not. This process has b...
John McDonnell | 520 c849 (Link to this contribution)
If that is the right hon. Gentleman's only concern and his only objection to the position of PCS, su...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c848-9 (Link to this contribution)
I have to take issue with the hon. Gentleman's phrase about the process just beginning to become pro...
John McDonnell | 520 c848 (Link to this contribution)
Following on from an earlier point, the Minister will know better than most of us that these negotia...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c848 (Link to this contribution)
It is really hard to do that, because, as I pointed out in the letter that I sent to all Members, th...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution)
The concern raised by the unions at the time was that there was insufficient compensation in the sch...
Michael McCann | 520 c848 (Link to this contribution)
Two pieces of information have come out on this. First, we received a Cabinet Office circular from t...
John McDonnell | 520 c847 (Link to this contribution)
I am sure that the right hon. Gentleman would not want inadvertently to mislead the House. Just for ...
Lord Maude of Horsham | 520 c846 (Link to this contribution)
I am grateful to the right hon. Member for Birmingham, Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne), who spoke from the Opp...
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2024-02-08 19:24:22 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_89374
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_89374
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_89374