UK Parliament / Open data

Local Government Bill [HL]

Legislative debate on Tuesday, 8 June 2010, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Howarth of Newport. The answering member was Baroness Hanham.
Local Government Bill. Debate on a motion to refer to the Examiners. Agreed on division (154 to 150).

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

719 c603-13 

Session

2010-12

Procedure

Government defeats

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Hanham | 719 c606-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am not sure how many noble Lords will want to take part in this debate, but I thought th...
Baroness Hollis of Heigham | 719 c609-10 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I, too, support the Motion. I declare an interest as a resident of Norwich and as a former...

Show all contributions (11)
Lord Richard | 719 c610 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, perhaps I may make two or three points. First, this Motion is certainly not about the meri...
Lord Howarth of Newport | 719 c610-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is appropriate that this has been a short debate. The noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, trai...
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | 719 c608 (Link to this contribution) Is not the problem—I am not sure that the noble Baroness has dealt with it yet—that the advice given...
Baroness Hanham | 719 c608 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my understanding is that the Public Bill Office has not changed its view as a result of th...
Lord Elystan-Morgan | 719 c608 (Link to this contribution) I rise to support the Motion. Even in my greatest delusions of grandeur, I do not consider myself a ...
Lord Howarth of Newport | 719 c603-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I declare an interest as a resident of Norwich. I want to put it to the House that there i...
Lord Howarth of Newport | 719 c603 (Link to this contribution) Moved by That the Bill be referred to the examiners.
Lord Strathclyde | 719 c613 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, a few moments ago when I was making the procedural statement, I explained that if the Moti...
Back to top