UK Parliament / Open data

Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010

Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 1 February 2010, in the House of Lords, led by Lord McKenzie of Luton. The answering member was Lord Bates.

Draft Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

717 c27-36GC

Session

2009-10

Department

Department for Communities and Local Government

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee

Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010
Monday, 8 February 2010
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords

Infrastructure Planning (Decisions) Regulations 2010
Tuesday, 5 January 2010
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Lord Jenkin of Roding | 717 c31-3GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I reassure the Minister that I intend to make a very much shorter speech than I did last w...

Lord Jenkin of Roding | 717 c33-4GC (Link to this contribution) I entirely understand that the noble Lord did not take part in the debates on the Planning Bill when...

Show all contributions (15)

Lord Jenkin of Roding | 717 c35GC (Link to this contribution) May we take it that the road map is comprehensive and accurate, and does not need further updating?

Baroness Hamwee | 717 c31GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am standing in for my noble friend Lord Tope. He would have liked to be here as he is le...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c33GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I start by thanking all noble Lords who have contributed to this debate. I also thank all ...

Lord Bates | 717 c30-1GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the regulations are straightforward but I have a few questions on which I seek clarificati...

Lord Bates | 717 c34GC (Link to this contribution) I like the way the Minister has explained the sentence to which I referred, but does he not accept t...

Lord Bates | 717 c35GC (Link to this contribution) That was not what I asked. I asked whether anything in the current order was different from what was...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c28-9GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, these regulations are of a technical nature and, while they are straightforward and uncont...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c27GC (Link to this contribution) That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Infrastructure Planning (...

Baroness Hamwee | 717 c33GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, before the Minister responds, the noble Lord has just referred to meeting Sir Michael Pitt...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c35-6GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I understand that it may be updated again. It is accurate as of today, but these are compl...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c34GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord for that clarification. He is correct: both Houses will have the opp...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c35GC (Link to this contribution) No, nothing changed as a result of the consultation in this case on this quite narrow order. The no...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 717 c34-5GC (Link to this contribution) It is a statement of fact, but if the noble Lord feels it could have been better worded, I accept hi...