UK Parliament / Open data

Community Interest Company (Amendment) Regulations 2009

Debates on delegated legislation on Monday, 6 July 2009, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Young of Norwood Green. The answering member was Lord De Mauley.
Draft Community Interest Company (Amendment) Regulations 2009. Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room. [Relevant document: 18th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments]

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

712 c172-5GC 

Session

2008-09

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Work and Families (Increase of Maximum Amount) Order 2009
Monday, 13 July 2009
Parliamentary proceedings
House of Lords
Deposited Paper DEP2009-1969
Monday, 13 July 2009
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Community Interest Company (Amendment) Regulations 2009
Wednesday, 17 June 2009
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
Statutory Instruments Joint Select Committee. Eighteenth report, drawing special attention to: Export Control (Uzbekistan) (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI 2009/1174).
Wednesday, 24 June 2009
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Lord Razzall | 712 c174GC (Link to this contribution) I am happy to support these regulations. I have one question about paragraph 8 on page 2 of the Expl...
Lord Young of Norwood Green | 712 c174-5GC (Link to this contribution) If the board is split equally, any proposal put to the board falls, so there is no deadlock. Those a...

Show all contributions (5)
Lord Young of Norwood Green | 712 c173-4GC (Link to this contribution) We are today debating the draft Community Interest Company (Amendment) Regulations. The community in...
Lord Young of Norwood Green | 712 c172GC (Link to this contribution) That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Community Interest Compan...
Lord De Mauley | 712 c174GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for explaining the regulations, which I do not believe are particularly controv...
Back to top