UK Parliament / Open data

Saving Gateway Accounts Bill

Debate on bills on Wednesday, 1 July 2009, in the House of Commons.
Saving Gateway Accounts Bill. Programme motion (No. 2) on proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments 1 to 8 considered and agreed to, the Commons being willing to waive their privileges in respect of Lords amendments 1 and 2.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

495 c412-22 

Session

2008-09

Department

Treasury

Legislative stage

Lords amendments

Procedure

Programme motions

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Related items

Saving Gateway Accounts Bill. Lords amendments. Explanatory Notes Bill 118-EN also published.
Wednesday, 17 June 2009
Bills
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c413 (Link to this contribution) Lords amendments 1 and 2 would make all recipients of carer's allowance eligible for the saving gate...
Speaker | 495 c413 (Link to this contribution) With this it will be convenient to discuss Lords amendment 2.

Show all contributions (24)
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c413 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.
Speaker | 495 c413 (Link to this contribution) I must draw the House's attention to the fact that privilege is involved in Lords amendments 1 and 2...
Speaker | 495 c413 (Link to this contribution) Order. Perhaps hon. Members who are not taking part in the debate will leave the Chamber quietly and...
Jeremy Browne | 495 c418 (Link to this contribution) At the risk of sounding somewhat graceless, I, too, wish the Government had gone a little bit furthe...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c418-9 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the fact that the Front-Bench spokesmen of both main Opposition parties appear to welcome ...
Mark Hoban | 495 c417-8 (Link to this contribution) I still do not quite understand why the Government have decided to specify in the Bill that the matu...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c416 (Link to this contribution) The amendments achieve three separate things, which I shall set out in turn. First, Lords amendments...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c422 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the support from both hon. Gentlemen for the amendment. Let me pick up on a couple of the ...
Jeremy Browne | 495 c421-2 (Link to this contribution) My party, for the reasons that have just been outlined by the hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban), s...
Mark Hoban | 495 c419-21 (Link to this contribution) As the Minister has said, we have been calling for a review of the scheme's effectiveness both in th...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c419 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 7. At various stages during the passage ...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c414 (Link to this contribution) As I was saying, the Government intended to table amendments in the other place, and my noble Friend...
Mark Hoban | 495 c414 (Link to this contribution) As the Minister said, the issue has been discussed at length in the Commons. The Government's late c...
Jeremy Browne | 495 c414 (Link to this contribution) I rise briefly to thank the Minister for accepting the amendment, which was tabled in my name in Com...
John Redwood | 495 c415 (Link to this contribution) When we last considered the Bill, I asked the Minister to tell us something about what kind of inter...
Speaker | 495 c416 (Link to this contribution) With this it will be convenient to consider Lords amendments 4 to 8.
John Redwood | 495 c415 (Link to this contribution) I quite agree with my right hon. Friend. We would like the scheme to work, because we agree with the...
Lord Deben | 495 c415 (Link to this contribution) Can my right hon. Friend imagine any company on earth that would make a proposition without properly...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c416 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 3.
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c415-6 (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the comments of the Opposition Front-Bench spokesmen, who said that they thought t...
Mark Hoban | 495 c416 (Link to this contribution) Given that the regulations are intended to have a maturity period of two years, why are the Governme...
Sarah McCarthy-Fry | 495 c416-7 (Link to this contribution) We cannot foresee a period in which a maturity period of less than 12 months would be desirable, whi...

Subjects

Bank services
Financial services
Personal savings
Low incomes
Carer's allowance

Legislation

Saving Gateway Accounts Bill 2008-09

Link

View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top