UK Parliament / Open data

Political Parties and Elections Bill

Debate on bills and Committee proceeding on Thursday, 30 April 2009, in the House of Lords.
Political Parties and Elections Bill. Lords Committee stage second day. Schedule 2 agreed to. Clauses 4 to 9 agreed to, with clauses 7 and 8 agreed to as amended. New clauses (Amendments 79 and 89) debated and withdrawn. Schedule 3 agreed to as amended. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

710 c105-66GC 

Session

2008-09

Department

Ministry of Justice

Legislative stage

Committee stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 710 c128-9GC (Link to this contribution) I take that point and I understand that it is always possible for someone to use information that th...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c123GC (Link to this contribution) My noble friend used the key word "approval". It may well be that a recommendation comes through, an...

Show all contributions (132)
Lord Henley | 710 c117-8GC (Link to this contribution) We broadly support Clause 5 as it is, and in doing so, support subsection (3), which we are largely ...
Lord Tyler | 710 c135GC (Link to this contribution) We, too, very much support this amendment, along similar lines to the noble Baroness. I am not sure ...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c130GC (Link to this contribution) I keep thinking of the Damian Green affair, where a civil servant had come straight from a political...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c159GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may respond to the issue of how difficult it is to prove recklessness. That is quite prope...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c157-8GC (Link to this contribution) Amendments 83, 87 and 88 relate only to Clause 8, the requirement for a declaration as to the source...
Lord Bach | 710 c156GC (Link to this contribution) For the record, the Rowntree report that I was talking about—it is easy to get them confused—is not ...
Lord Henley | 710 c147-8GC (Link to this contribution) That is not a matter for me to address at this stage. I noted what the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, said ...
Lord Tyler | 710 c148GC (Link to this contribution) I am listening with great interest to the noble Lord, but does he accept that that principle has bee...
Lord Henley | 710 c147GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, will not be surprised to learn that he does not have my suppo...
Lord Bach | 710 c141GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to both noble Lords for supporting this part of the Bill and the government amendments...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c128GC (Link to this contribution) My point was not that someone would be in a politically sensitive role all the time, but that people...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c129GC (Link to this contribution) I completely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbots.
Lord Henley | 710 c110GC (Link to this contribution) Again, the noble Lord’s argument seems to be that we must follow the precedent of an earlier Act—in ...
Lord Bach | 710 c111GC (Link to this contribution) The amendments would slightly alter the language used to describe the circumstances in which the com...
Lord Henley | 710 c108-9GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak also to Amendment 71. The amendments are designed to stimulate a brief discussion on e...
Lord Rennard | 710 c109GC (Link to this contribution) I understand why the Electoral Commission opposes this amendment. It suggests that it may ultimately...
Lord Bach | 710 c107-8GC (Link to this contribution) We understand the desire that the commission should act in a timely manner. We all wish to see the c...
Lord Bach | 710 c106-7GC (Link to this contribution) The amendments seek to amend the paragraphs of this part of the schedule that define the circumstanc...
Lord Haskel | 710 c106GC (Link to this contribution) I have to tell the Committee that if Amendment 47 is agreed I cannot call Amendment 48 because of pr...
Lord Haskel | 710 c105GC (Link to this contribution) I have to tell the Committee that if there is a Division in the Chamber while we are sitting, the Co...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 710 c124GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 6: Number of Electoral Commissioners Debate on whether Clause 6 should stand part of the Bil...
Lord Norton of Louth | 710 c119GC (Link to this contribution) I raise one point that has not been touched on. I have considerable sympathy with the substance of p...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c121GC (Link to this contribution) My noble friend said that commissioners are expected to act in "a non-partisan way". He did not mana...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c121GC (Link to this contribution) I said, although I may have mumbled it, that the commission staff make decisions on penalties, seeki...
Lord Borrie | 710 c118-9GC (Link to this contribution) I offer a few words before the Minister responds. Like my noble friend Lady Gould, I agree with so m...
Lord Tyler | 710 c112-5GC (Link to this contribution) I should remind the Grand Committee, as I mentioned at Second Reading, that although I do not have a...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c117GC (Link to this contribution) I want to ask a very simple question. With the permission of the Committee, I shall do so now so as ...
Lord Bach | 710 c136GC (Link to this contribution) I am very surprised that the Committee is seriously proposing that we should add to, rather than tak...
Lord Norton of Louth | 710 c138GC (Link to this contribution) I am tempted to ask the Minister whether he recognises that he is speaking out loud. I am very grate...
Lord Tyler | 710 c136-7GC (Link to this contribution) But surely in such circumstances all the Secretary of State has to do is to say, "This report does n...
Lord Bach | 710 c136GC (Link to this contribution) There are some commission reports to which it is not necessary for the Government to respond.
Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 710 c132GC (Link to this contribution) I have a problem with the last comment. I know many people who are interested in that aspect of elec...
Lord Norton of Louth | 710 c133-4GC (Link to this contribution) The Electoral Commission is required by Section 6 of the 2000 Act to keep under review and from time...
Lord Norton of Louth | 710 c133GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 79 79: After Clause 7, insert the following new Clause— "Reports of Electoral Commission ...
Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 710 c134-5GC (Link to this contribution) I support the amendment. It is absolutely right that if, in fact, the Electoral Commission has been ...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c135GC (Link to this contribution) I shall be brief but perhaps marginally more controversial. I completely support the amendment, alth...
Lord Tyler | 710 c130-1GC (Link to this contribution) That is a formidable point and it reflects the one that I made about enforcement. The commission has...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c130GC (Link to this contribution) I am extremely grateful. The noble Lord raised the question of enforcement. I understand the point a...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c131GC (Link to this contribution) Any member of the commission staff doing any task must act impartially. The power in this clause is ...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c131GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may put a scenario to my noble friend. This is a real world question. Imagine a young soci...
Lord Tyler | 710 c162GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may briefly respond. The noble Lord, Lord Brooke, has a great deal more experience than I ...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 710 c162GC (Link to this contribution) My intervention will be extremely brief. I did not table an amendment to this effect, but does the n...
Lord Henley | 710 c159GC (Link to this contribution) I take note of what the Minister said, but I am buoyed up by the fact that both the noble Lords, Lor...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 710 c159GC (Link to this contribution) In view of what has been said, I support the second two amendments of the noble Lord, Lord Henley. R...
Lord Henley | 710 c156-7GC (Link to this contribution) I shall speak also to Amendments 87 and 88. We now move on to what will be new Section 54A, which is...
Lord Tyler | 710 c155GC (Link to this contribution) I am not sure whether the Minister intended to complete his remarks, but could he address the import...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 710 c150-1GC (Link to this contribution) I have no difficulty at all in recognising that fact. It is obviously worth referring to in the cont...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c155-6GC (Link to this contribution) I think that they will be far more interested in what the Minister said as against what I said. It i...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c150GC (Link to this contribution) If I had still been in the elected House, I would have voted against it and spoken against it with p...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 710 c150GC (Link to this contribution) I do not think that the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, would regard it as a betrayal of a confid...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c149GC (Link to this contribution) I recognise the powerful, if emotional, appeal made by the noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours. Some a...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 710 c149-50GC (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister rises, I have been reminded of one more question for the noble Lord, Lord Campbe...
Lord Henley | 710 c148GC (Link to this contribution) It might have been blown to smithereens on that one point but it still exists here. It is a valid po...
Lord Tyler | 710 c140GC (Link to this contribution) There was a moment of considerable concern in my mind because I was anxious that we should not proce...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c127GC (Link to this contribution) I have Amendment 76 in this grouping. I begin by apologising to the Committee for not having been he...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c124-7GC (Link to this contribution) In moving this amendment, I shall also speak to Amendments 77 and 78. I have a short, non-controvers...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c127GC (Link to this contribution) I think I mean the chairman, but maybe the chief executive has the final call. Do either of them hav...
Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 710 c128GC (Link to this contribution) First, I should say how much I appreciate the fact that the Government have picked up the point that...
Lord Henley | 710 c110GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 72 72: Schedule 2, page 44, line 43, after "their" insert "reasonable"
Lord Henley | 710 c110-1GC (Link to this contribution) We now come to the end of this batch of opposition amendments. In moving Amendment 72, I shall also ...
Lord Henley | 710 c108GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister. I understand clearly that if one puts "promptly" in one piece of legi...
Lord Henley | 710 c107GC (Link to this contribution) I shall not be moving the two other amendments in this group—Amendments 60B and 62—as I think that w...
Lord Henley | 710 c107GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 60A 60A: Schedule 2, page 35, line 41, after "shall" insert "promptly"
Lord Henley | 710 c105-6GC (Link to this contribution) In the absence of my noble friend Lord Bates, I shall be moving the Conservative amendments today. I...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c124GC (Link to this contribution) There are several things that we will need to put in a letter, particularly the delicate points that...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c117GC (Link to this contribution) My noble friend, who has great experience in these matters, referred to guidance. Do we not need a l...
Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 710 c117GC (Link to this contribution) That is an important point. There may have to be occasions when the commission does not participate....
Baroness Gould of Potternewton | 710 c115-6GC (Link to this contribution) I have a little problem with the amendment. It is not that I disagree with it, because in a sense I ...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 710 c116-7GC (Link to this contribution) I am delighted to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Gould. We are extremely fortunate that she is serv...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 710 c136GC (Link to this contribution) In the briefing which the commission has given us for this amendment, there is an indication that th...
Lord Bach | 710 c136GC (Link to this contribution) But what an added piece of bureaucracy to have to respond within six months. It is small but signifi...
Lord Bach | 710 c137-8GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I could go on to what I considered my strongest point, which is that such a shift risks seri...
Lord Norton of Louth | 710 c138GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for the Minister’s response. He has listened to the Committee. I think it is worth rei...
Lord Bach | 710 c138GC (Link to this contribution) I cannot help but have heard the strong arguments around the Committee on this issue. Although I hav...
Lord Tyler | 710 c130GC (Link to this contribution) Again, I understand the noble Lord’s point, but whether that individual had been immune from direct ...
Lord Tyler | 710 c129-30GC (Link to this contribution) I wish to make a brief contribution. We, too, see the logic of clarifying these issues and we very m...
Lord Henley | 710 c129GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may make one or two brief comments. We are sympathetic to these government amendments, but...
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c131-2GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may press the Minister a little further. There are concerns around this issue and the nobl...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c131GC (Link to this contribution) I have little to add to what I have said but it is important to thank the noble Baroness, Lady Gould...
Lord Bach | 710 c166GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 95 95: Schedule 3, page 46, leave out lines 41 and 42 Amendment 95 agreed. Amendment 96...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c166GC (Link to this contribution) This may be convenient moment for the Committee to adjourn until next Tuesday at 3.30 pm.
Lord Bach | 710 c165GC (Link to this contribution) Schedule 3: Declaration as to source of donation Amendment 91 91: Schedule 3, page 46, line 20, le...
Lord Tyler | 710 c164GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Marland, in particular, because I know that we share a gr...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c162-4GC (Link to this contribution) I must say that officials and ourselves had also read the amendment as implying that it would apply ...
Lord Tyler | 710 c160GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 89 89: After Clause 8, insert the following new Clause— "Donations by companies controlle...
Lord Rennard | 710 c157GC (Link to this contribution) The amendments in this group do not really find favour with me. Amendment 83 would cause confusion w...
Lord Borrie | 710 c159GC (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Lord sits down, would he not agree that the word "reckless" implies that you do not...
Lord Henley | 710 c159GC (Link to this contribution) I will certainly look at that in due course. The third amendment is the most important. I always wor...
Lord Bach | 710 c155GC (Link to this contribution) I have an answer for the noble Lord: if donations which are above the recordable threshold of £500 u...
Lord Bach | 710 c155GC (Link to this contribution) I suspect that Members of Parliament may also want to read what the noble Lord said.
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c148-9GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may intervene. As Ministers would say, "It is not in my brief to reply on issues of Europe...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c147GC (Link to this contribution) How would we manage to regulate a multiplicity of £50,000 donations coming in from some obscure part...
Lord Henley | 710 c140GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for speaking to the government amendments and for touching on our Amen...
Lord Bach | 710 c139GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 8: Declaration as to source of donation Amendment 80 80: Clause 8, page 6, line 6, leave ou...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c138GC (Link to this contribution) This may be a convenient point for the Committee to adjourn for 10 minutes. Sitting suspended.
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c127GC (Link to this contribution) Did the noble Lord mean to say the chairman of the commission or the chief executive?
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | 710 c127-8GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that—he has the final call. My issue relates to subsection (3) of the new section....
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c127GC (Link to this contribution) The final decision lies with the chief executive under the clause.
Lord Henley | 710 c111-2GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord took a stronger line on the second amendment, rather than on the first. I was perfect...
Lord Henley | 710 c108GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 61 61: Schedule 2, page 36, leave out lines 28 and 29
Lord Bach | 710 c109-10GC (Link to this contribution) This amendment and Amendment 71 grouped with it both relate to provisions in the Bill for the commis...
Lord Henley | 710 c107GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that explanation from the noble Lord. If I heard him correctly at the beginning—pe...
Lord Henley | 710 c105GC (Link to this contribution) Schedule 2: Civil sanctions: Schedule to be inserted into the 2000 Act Amendment 47 47: Schedule 2...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c124GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 7: Political restrictions on Electoral Commissioners and staff Amendment 75 75: Clause 7, p...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c119-21GC (Link to this contribution) I thank noble Lords for this interesting debate, particularly the story of the conversion of the nob...
Lord Tyler | 710 c121-3GC (Link to this contribution) This has been a very useful debate and, at the very least, it will help to inform all those who may ...
Lord Tyler | 710 c123-4GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord. We do not have that guidance from the Minister. He may feel that it...
Lord Tyler | 710 c112GC (Link to this contribution) Clause 5: Four Electoral Commissioners to be persons put forward by parties Amendment 74 74: Claus...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c132-3GC (Link to this contribution) Amendments 77 and 78 77: Clause 7, page 5, line 41, at end insert— "11B(1) The chief executive of t...
Lord Tunnicliffe | 710 c132GC (Link to this contribution) I have nothing to add at this point. Amendment 75 agreed. Amendment 76 not moved.
Lord Bach | 710 c135-6GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment would require the Secretary of State to provide a written response to reports issued b...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c136GC (Link to this contribution) Under subsection (2) of the proposed new clause, I presume that the Government could reply and say t...
Lord Bach | 710 c165GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 93 93: Schedule 3, page 46, line 26, leave out from first "a" to "by" in line 28 and inse...
Lord Marland | 710 c164GC (Link to this contribution) I apologise for arriving late at the Committee. I also apologise for taking noble Lords beyond four ...
Lord Tyler | 710 c160-2GC (Link to this contribution) We do not need to spend a great deal of time on this matter because to some extent we have covered i...
Lord Henley | 710 c159GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 85 85: Clause 8, page 6, leave out lines 37 to 40 Amendment 85 agreed. Amendments 86 to...
Lord Henley | 710 c158-9GC (Link to this contribution) At this stage, I can do nothing other than withdraw it. However, I am not happy with that response. ...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c156GC (Link to this contribution) The reference to the interflow of data between various organisations within government appears in th...
Lord Henley | 710 c156GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 83 83: Clause 8, page 6, line 16, leave out "best of the individual’s" and insert "indivi...
Lord Bach | 710 c151-4GC (Link to this contribution) The intention behind Amendments 82 and 84 is to seek to tie the ability of an individual to make a p...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c155GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to my noble friend for his comments. I do not want to be rude to noble Lords, but I sh...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c150GC (Link to this contribution) My proposal provides for a stronger threshold than simply being on the electoral roll.
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 710 c149GC (Link to this contribution) In that case, I was not sufficiently familiar with the Bill. I hope not to irritate my erstwhile Con...
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | 710 c148GC (Link to this contribution) As a fundraiser for the UK Independence Party, I find these amendments inconvenient. However, I also...
Lord Tyler | 710 c145-7GC (Link to this contribution) I and my noble friend Lord Rennard have added our names to Amendments 82 and 84 for a number of reas...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c141GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 82 82: Clause 8, page 6, line 8, at end insert— "(1A) In section 54 of the 2000 Act (perm...
Lord Campbell-Savours | 710 c141-5GC (Link to this contribution) I am afraid that I shall spend a little more time on this amendment. I have tried to be brief on oth...
Lord Bach | 710 c139-40GC (Link to this contribution) In moving Amendment 80, I shall speak also to Amendments 85, 91, 93 and 95, which propose altering C...
Lord Brougham and Vaux | 710 c139GC (Link to this contribution) If Amendment 80 is agreed, I cannot call Amendment 81 because of pre-emption.
Back to top