UK Parliament / Open data

Social Security (National Insurance Credits) Amendment Regulations 2007

Debates on delegated legislation on Thursday, 22 November 2007, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Skelmersdale. The answering member was Lord McKenzie of Luton.

Social Security (National Insurance Credits) Amendment Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2582). Lords debate on motion that an Humble Adress be presented to Her Majesty praying that the order be annulled. Motion withdrawn.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

696 c1001-12

Session

2007-08

Department

Department for Work and Pensions

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Deposited Paper DEP2007-0268
Wednesday, 5 December 2007
Deposited papers
House of Lords

Social Security (National Insurance Credits) Amendment Regulations 2007
Friday, 7 September 2007
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 696 c1011 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the transfer from NIRS1 to NIRS2 took place in 1998, and that was certainly a key factor i...

Lord Skelmersdale | 696 c1011 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that was an interesting speech from the Minister. He seems to have gained the impression i...

Show all contributions (10)

Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 696 c1009 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, for the avoidance of doubt, will the Minister make it clear that the money to be found to ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 696 c1006-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the noble Lords, Lord Skelmersdale and Lord Kirkwood, for their contributions toda...

Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope | 696 c1004-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the House should be grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, for moving this Motion....

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 696 c1007-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I do not accept that. Perhaps we may go into the detail of the point on another occasion b...

Lord Skelmersdale | 696 c1007 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it may be a completely different situation, but the result in essence is exactly the same....

Lord Skelmersdale | 696 c1011-2 (Link to this contribution) Yes, my Lords, it is of course part of government safeguards, and it should be part of Parliament’s ...

Lord McKenzie of Luton | 696 c1009-11 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the administrative costs will have to come from the routine DWP DEL budget. For example, ...

Lord Skelmersdale | 696 c1001-4 (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty praying that the regulations laid b...