UK Parliament / Open data

Statistics and Registration Service Bill

Debate on bills on Wednesday, 18 July 2007, in the House of Commons.
Statistics and Registration Service Bill. Lords reasons for insisting on amendments considered. Motion that Commons insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments 12, 13, 15, 20, 67 to 70 and 72 but does not insist on its Amendments 15B and 15C but proposes amendments to the words restored to the Bill by disagreement with Lords amendments 15: (a), (b) and (c). Agreed to on division (303 to 190).

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

463 c311-25 

Session

2006-07

Department

Treasury

Legislative stage

Lords amendments

Procedure

Lords reasons

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Proceeding contributions

Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c320-1 (Link to this contribution) What is being suggested is that the 24-hour maximum that the Prime Minister has proposed should be i...
Robert Smith | 463 c321 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Lady should recognise that Prime Ministers come and go and, as she said, the legislation mu...

Show all contributions (22)
Angela Eagle | 463 c321 (Link to this contribution) Is the hon. Gentleman also seriously suggesting that when the Prime Minister makes a statement on th...
Angela Eagle | 463 c321 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman should listen more carefully to what I say. I made no suggestion that the Governm...
Paul Flynn | 463 c319 (Link to this contribution) I disagree on what is the central issue of the Bill. For me, the central issue is the independence o...
Angela Eagle | 463 c320 (Link to this contribution) The debate has resembled others on the matter, both those in which I have participated and those tha...
Michael Fallon | 463 c318-9 (Link to this contribution) I was never senior enough a Minister to be entrusted with figures even to try to spin. What is inter...
Vincent Cable | 463 c317 (Link to this contribution) Unlike the Conservative spokesman, the hon. Member for Runnymede and Weybridge (Mr. Hammond), and th...
Michael Fallon | 463 c317-8 (Link to this contribution) In common with the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable) and my hon. Friend the Member for Runnymed...
Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c316 (Link to this contribution) We have never disputed that. The issue is who should be the arbiter of the period of advance notice,...
Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c316 (Link to this contribution) We recognise, and we have recognised throughout the debate, that Ministers have a legitimate interes...
Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c314-6 (Link to this contribution) Indeed, although the Exchequer Secretary did not come quite as late to the Bill as I did. I have had...
Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c313-4 (Link to this contribution) I am trying to persuade the House that it amounts to much less than independent control of the rules...
Angela Eagle | 463 c314 (Link to this contribution) Will the hon. Gentleman at least acknowledge, so that we can have a debate in which we are in contac...
Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c314 (Link to this contribution) The Exchequer Secretary talks about 24 hours, but I do not see 24 hours in her proposal, which we sh...
Angela Eagle | 463 c311-2 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move,"That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments Nos. 1...
Angela Eagle | 463 c313 (Link to this contribution) Is the hon. Gentleman trying to persuade the House that all the arrangements that I have set out—boa...
Angela Eagle | 463 c318 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman was once a Minister. Did he spin figures to which he had privileged access as a M...
Angela Eagle | 463 c316 (Link to this contribution) I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way once more. He just used a phrase that is quite interesting...
Lord Hammond of Runnymede | 463 c312-3 (Link to this contribution) The purpose of the Bill, which the hon. Member for Wentworth (John Healey) spelled out on Second Rea...
Back to top