UK Parliament / Open data

Greater London Authority Bill

Debate on bills on Tuesday, 19 June 2007, in the House of Lords.
Greater London Authority Bill. Lords Report stage first day. Part 1 of 3 records. Amendment 3 agreed to on division.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

693 c108-24 

Session

2006-07

Legislative stage

Report stage

Procedure

New clauses

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Greater London Authority Bill. As amended in Grand Committee.
Monday, 14 May 2007
Bills
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Baroness Hanham | 693 c121-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have been fascinated by the arguments put contrary to my amendment. I am bound to say th...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c120-1 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords for elucidating and developing the debate that we had in Comm...

Show all contributions (19)
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c114 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, would not the GLA’s ability to scrutinise properly be hampered without it? In a moment I s...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c114 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I believe that the Mayor has a strategy for consulting the GLA, which is probably well kno...
Baroness Turner of Camden | 693 c113 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I quite understand the desire to ensure that there is proper consultation and to have some...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c113 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I confess that I do. In Committee, we had a very interesting debate about consultation and...
Lord Tope | 693 c116-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I should like to speak to Amendments Nos. 26 and 93, standing in my name and that of my no...
Lord Graham of Edmonton | 693 c117-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, my recollection is that Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected for four terms: in 1932, 193...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c114 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for her answer. In response to the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, I say...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c114-6 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 3: 3: Before Clause 3, insert the following new Clause— ““Mayor: limit on numb...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c118-20 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I support my noble friend, which is possibly not a surprise because I think that my name i...
Baroness Thornton | 693 c118 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I had not intended to speak, but I wanted to add to my noble friend’s comments. I urge rej...
Lord Graham of Edmonton | 693 c109 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we are entering an area where people have a vested interest. I say that in a benign way. T...
Baroness Andrews | 693 c109-10 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to noble Lords who have spoken in this short debate. I am bound to disappoin...
Lord Hanningfield | 693 c111-2 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 2: 2: Clause 2, page 2, line 33, at end insert— ““(2A) After section 42A of th...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c111 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for the first of many responses today. I hope that we will do better ...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c112 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I shall pick up points that were made in Grand Committee on the same amendment. Would the ...
Baroness Hamwee | 693 c109 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Baroness referred to the London family. Over the years, comments have been made ...
Baroness Hanham | 693 c108 (Link to this contribution) moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 2, page 2, line 23, leave out ““or any of the functional bodies””...
Back to top