UK Parliament / Open data

Decommissioning of Fishing Vessels Scheme 2007

Legislative debate on Wednesday, 7 March 2007, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Rooker. The answering member was Baroness Byford.
Decommissioning of Fishing Vessels Scheme 2007 (SI 2007/312). Lords debate on a motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

690 c20-7GC 

Session

2006-07

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Decommissioning of Fishing Vessels Scheme 2007
Thursday, 8 February 2007
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Lord Greaves | 690 c26GC (Link to this contribution) Will the formula used to calculate the ranking be provided to people before they bid?
Lady Saltoun of Abernethy | 690 c26-7GC (Link to this contribution) I should like a little clarification. Paragraph 5 on page 2 says: "““A successful applicant for a gr...

Show all contributions (9)
Lord Rooker | 690 c20-1GC (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Decommissio...
Lord Rooker | 690 c27GC (Link to this contribution) No, it is a fishing vessel. It has been decommissioned from fishing and is therefore scrap. They wil...
Lord Rooker | 690 c26GC (Link to this contribution) Yes, it has to be transparent. When the money runs out, that is the end. There is a limit on the fin...
Lord Rooker | 690 c24-6GC (Link to this contribution) I am most grateful for the response and I shall do my best to answer the detailed questions. The cen...
Lord Greaves | 690 c23-4GC (Link to this contribution) I, too, thank the Minister for his very clear explanation of the scheme. I also thank the noble Baro...
Earl of Selborne | 690 c24GC (Link to this contribution) As the Minister reminded us, this is a small and well-targeted scheme. It is salutary to remember th...
Baroness Byford | 690 c21-3GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the Minister for the way in which he has introduced this scheme, and for explaining...
Back to top