UK Parliament / Open data

London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill

Debate on bills on Tuesday, 21 March 2006, in the House of Commons.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill. Programme motion (No 2) on proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages agreed to on question (formal). Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments 1 to 20 agreed to.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

444 c201-13 

Session

2005-06

Department

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

Legislative stage

Lords amendments

Procedure

Programme motions

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber

Related items

London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill. Lords amendments (vote)
Wednesday, 15 March 2006
Bills
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Richard Caborn | 444 c202 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Speaker | 444 c204 (Link to this contribution) Order. I hope that the hon. Gentleman’s intervention will relate to the amendments.

Show all contributions (30)
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c204 (Link to this contribution) I am delighted that the Minister introduced this string of amendments and, quite rightly, used it as...
Hugh Robertson | 444 c203-4 (Link to this contribution) I, for one, am extremely encouraged that we are all here. On Third Reading, I said that, although th...
Richard Caborn | 444 c202-3 (Link to this contribution) I could not agree more—[Interruption.] My hon. Friend the Member for Cardiff, West (Kevin Brennan) t...
Andy Reed | 444 c202 (Link to this contribution) Does my right hon. Friend agree that the success of the Commonwealth games means that it is even mor...
Richard Caborn | 444 c202 (Link to this contribution) I shall be advising the House to accept all the amendments made in the other place. They were all ta...
Speaker | 444 c202 (Link to this contribution) With this we may discuss Lords amendments Nos. 2 to 10.
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c204-6 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Gentleman is right to suggest that, on the important matter of advertising, we do not want ...
Chris Bryant | 444 c204 (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to you, Madam Deputy Speaker, for your advice. I was going to say that, when cons...
Hugh Robertson | 444 c209 (Link to this contribution) The amendment addresses the use of presumption, in that a person is ““presumed”” to have infringed t...
Hugh Robertson | 444 c207 (Link to this contribution) As the Minister has said, this group of amendments addresses concerns raised by the broadcasting and...
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c207 (Link to this contribution) There is no doubt that this is a welcome group of amendments. As the hon. Member for Faversham and M...
Speaker | 444 c206 (Link to this contribution) With this we may discuss Lords amendments Nos. 12, 13 and 18 to 20.
Richard Caborn | 444 c206-7 (Link to this contribution) The thanks that the hon. Member for Faversham and Mid-Kent (Hugh Robertson) gave to my staff and all...
Speaker | 444 c208 (Link to this contribution) With this we may discuss Lords amendments Nos. 15 and 16.
Richard Caborn | 444 c208-9 (Link to this contribution) This group of amendments relates to the status of the words and phrases listed in schedule 4. In deb...
Justine Greening | 444 c208 (Link to this contribution) I briefly wish to take the opportunity to add my support to the amendments. We all recognise that, a...
Richard Caborn | 444 c208 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Richard Caborn | 444 c206 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That the House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.
Maria Miller | 444 c211 (Link to this contribution) I welcome the amendment on evidential presumption, because the matter caused a great deal of debate ...
Richard Caborn | 444 c211-2 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment. I have heard the commen...
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c212 (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister agree that there would be another possible reason for a change if the IOC changed ...
Richard Caborn | 444 c212 (Link to this contribution) That is right. The IOC could make such a change, perhaps in response to an international issue, in w...
Hugh Robertson | 444 c212 (Link to this contribution) As the Minister has said, the amendment gives statutory force to the requirement to consult the adve...
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c212-3 (Link to this contribution) Like the hon. Member for Faversham and Mid-Kent (Hugh Robertson), I am delighted that we have seen t...
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c213 (Link to this contribution) The Minister certainly deserves to take a bow. He has worked hard on the Bill, and he has been willi...
Lord Foster of Bath | 444 c209-10 (Link to this contribution) I, too, am delighted to say that we will support the amendments. This matter caused great concern du...
Andy Reed | 444 c210-1 (Link to this contribution) I add my congratulations on the way in which this issue has been dealt with, which demonstrates that...

Subjects

Broadcasting
Advertising
Greater London
Intellectual property
Olympic Games
Newspaper press
Marketing
Paralympic Games
Regulation
Sports
London 2012 Organising Committee

Legislation

London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06

Link

View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top