UK Parliament / Open data

Artists Resale Right Regulations

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 24 January 2006, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Sainsbury of Turville. The answering member was Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville.
Draft SI on artist’s resale right (SI 2006/346). Lords debate on motion to approve. Amendment withdrawn. Main question agreed to on question.

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

677 c1142-74 

Session

2005-06

Department

Department of Trade and Industry

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber

Related items

Artists Resale Right Regulations 2006
Thursday, 15 December 2005
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons
European Parliament and Council Directive 2001/84/EC on the resale right for benefit of author of an original work of art. Adopted 27.09.2001.
Friday, 12 October 2001
European material produced by EU institutions
Merits of Statutory Instruments Select Committee (HL). 20th report on draft SIs on artists resale right (SI 2006/346) and representation of the people (england and wales) (amendment) and SI 2005/3359, SI 2005/3433, SI 2005/3442, SI 2005/3447, SI 2005/3459 and SI 2005/3460 and explanatory information on SI 2005/333 and SI 2005/3432.
Tuesday, 17 January 2006
Parliamentary committees
House of Lords

Proceeding contributions

Lord Clement-Jones | 677 c1165-6 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for his introduction of the regulations and the noble Lord, Lord Broo...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 677 c1166 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the Arts Council thinks that there are 96,000 artists. In a submission to parliamentarians...

Show all contributions (29)
Lord Clement-Jones | 677 c1166-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that is the evidence that has been put forward by a number of bodies, and it is what we re...
Viscount Astor | 677 c1167-9 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the question that the Minister failed to address when he introduced this order was why the...
Lord Inglewood | 677 c1158-60 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I should declare an interest: my wife is a professional photographer who sells prints from...
Earl Howe | 677 c1160-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I intervene briefly in this debate. In doing so, I declare an interest as chairman of LAPA...
Lord Freyberg | 677 c1162-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, first I declare an interest as an artist who at some stage could benefit from the new meas...
Lord Marlesford | 677 c1164-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I support the extremely persuasive speech of my noble friend Lord Brooke. Unlike a number ...
Lord Jopling | 677 c1170 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord. In his opening speech, he told us that the cost was £1. H...
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c1169-70 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, following the approval of these regulations, artist’s resale right will be introduced in t...
Lord McKenzie of Luton | 677 c1154 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this is not a time-limited debate. I suggest that we hear from the noble Lord, Lord Dubs. ...
Lord Bernstein of Craigweil | 677 c1153-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have the greatest respect for my noble friend the Minister, so I regret supporting this ...
Lord Jopling | 677 c1151-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am not sure what interests I should declare. My wife and I are occasional purchasers of ...
Lord Monson | 677 c1152-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this is a perfectly dreadful set of regulations and I very much welcome the attempt by the...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 677 c1146-51 (Link to this contribution) rose to move, as an amendment to the above Motion, at end to insert ““but this House regrets that th...
Lord Willoughby de Broke | 677 c1157-8 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, when the Minister started his speech and talked about concessions, I thought he was going ...
Lord Luke | 677 c1155-7 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville on securing this debate on...
Lord Dubs | 677 c1154-5 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I shall be brief and, in contrast to other speakers, support the Government. The informat...
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c1172-3 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I do not think that we have a total figure, but it obviously depends on what the spread of...
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 677 c1173-4 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank everyone who has spoken in this good debate. I shall do my best to conclude by 10 ...
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c1171-2 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I still cannot see that the provision in this context prejudices that; that is the legal v...
Lord Marlesford | 677 c1172 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, can the noble Lord enlighten me before he leaves that point? The decision to go for €1,000...
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c1171 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on that basis, obviously the fact that a sum of money is deducted for buyer’s premium coul...
Lord Inglewood | 677 c1171 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, with all due respect to the Minister, that is not correct, because the buyer’s premium is ...
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c1170-1 (Link to this contribution) No, my Lords. I was saying very clearly that I still think it is closer to £1. I did not say that it...
Lord Inglewood | 677 c1171 (Link to this contribution) My Lords, surely what has happened here is that, as the law stands, the owner of a work of art owns ...
Lord Sainsbury of Turville | 677 c1142-6 (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the draft regulations laid before the House on 15 December be approved [20th Repo...

Subjects

Administration
Concessions
Art works
Fees and charges
EU law
Intellectual property
Payments
Prices
Sales
Royalties
Small businesses
Taxation
Visual arts

Legislation

Artists Resale Right Regulations 2006

Link

View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Back to top