UK Parliament / Open data

Terrorism Bill

Debate on bills on Wednesday, 9 November 2005, in the House of Commons, led by Charles Clarke. The answering member was Dominic Grieve.
Terrorism Bill. Programme motion (No 2) for proceedings on Report. Agreed to on division (317 to 213)

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

439 c310-24 

Session

2005-06

Department

Home Office

Procedure

Programme motions

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Terrorism Bill. As amended in Committee.
Thursday, 3 November 2005
Bills
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

John Bercow | 439 c311 (Link to this contribution) My hon. Friend will agree that it is important that our proceedings today should be intelligible to ...
Dominic Grieve | 439 c310-1 (Link to this contribution) I will not seek to divide the House on the programme motion, but I should point out to the Home Secr...

Show all contributions (29)
Charles Clarke | 439 c310 (Link to this contribution) I beg to move,"That the Order of 26th October 2005 (Terrorism Bill (Programme)) be varied as follows...
David Heath | 439 c312 (Link to this contribution) I do not disagree with anything that the hon. Gentleman is saying, but does he agree that if the Hou...
Dominic Grieve | 439 c311-2 (Link to this contribution) I entirely agree. Even if Members act with reasonable expedition, the second part of the motion in p...
Robert Smith | 439 c312 (Link to this contribution) The hon. Member for Buckingham (John Bercow) said that it would not be our fault if there was ping-p...
Dominic Grieve | 439 c312 (Link to this contribution) I do agree. As I said to the Home Secretary last week, the controversial nature of the Bill makes it...
Speaker | 439 c317 (Link to this contribution) Order. The hon. Gentleman should not stray into that matter.
Lembit Opik | 439 c316-7 (Link to this contribution) I simply do not believe that there is enough time to understand the unexplained contradictions betwe...
Lord Cormack | 439 c315-6 (Link to this contribution) I have yet to be able to take part in debates on this Bill because of other duties in the House, a...
Alex Salmond | 439 c314-5 (Link to this contribution) I agree with the right hon. and learned Member for Rushcliffe (Mr. Clarke), although I recall that i...
Lord Clarke of Nottingham | 439 c313-4 (Link to this contribution) I do not wish to be churlish, and I congratulate the Home Secretary on producing a programme motion ...
Alistair Carmichael | 439 c313 (Link to this contribution) I took exception to very little that was said by the hon. Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve). Like...
Dominic Grieve | 439 c312-3 (Link to this contribution) If Members of the other place see that important issues raised in Committee and postponed until Repo...
Speaker | 439 c312 (Link to this contribution) Order. I know that the hon. Member for Blyth Valley (Mr. Campbell) gets very excited sometimes, bu...
Richard Shepherd | 439 c317 (Link to this contribution) It was right for the Government to take the Committee stage on the Floor of the House, because the B...
Lembit Opik | 439 c317 (Link to this contribution) Even more contradictions are thrown up by other legislation, but I shall not go into them now, Mr. S...
Robert Smith | 439 c318 (Link to this contribution) I want briefly to reinforce the point made by the hon. Member for South Staffordshire (Sir Patrick C...
John Bercow | 439 c318-9 (Link to this contribution) I agree with those who have argued that the programme motion is unsound and unsatisfactory. It may r...
Lord Cormack | 439 c319 (Link to this contribution) I am extremely grateful to my hon. Friend, who makes a very important point. I well remember the day...
John Bercow | 439 c319 (Link to this contribution) I will conclude in a moment, but of course I must give way to my hon. Friend.
Simon Hughes | 439 c320 (Link to this contribution) I endorse what has been said so far, and wish to make two other brief points. I also have a question...
John Bercow | 439 c319-20 (Link to this contribution) I only wish that this Prime Minister would do that. I repeat that I respect his motivation, and thin...
Simon Hughes | 439 c320 (Link to this contribution) The House of Lords does not have a guillotine procedure. The debate there will go on for as long as ...
Ronnie Campbell | 439 c320 (Link to this contribution) How long will the House of Lords debate this matter for?
Speaker | 439 c320 (Link to this contribution) Order. The hon. Gentleman is going wide of the programme motion.
Rob Marris | 439 c321 (Link to this contribution) Debate is important, quality and brevity are desirable. Long-windedness, repetition and mere quantit...
Dominic Grieve | 439 c312 (Link to this contribution) I agree—all the more so because it seemed to me during last week’s debates that we were moving towar...
Back to top