UK Parliament / Open data

Railways (Convention on International Carriage by Rail) Regulations 2005

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 19 July 2005, in the House of Lords, led by Lord Davies of Oldham. The answering member was Baroness Hanham.
Draft SI on railways (convention on international carriage by rail) (SI 2005/2092). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room)

About these Parliamentary proceedings

Reference

673 c179-86GC 

Session

2005-06

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords Grand Committee
Railways (Convention on International Carriage by Rail) Regulations 2005
Monday, 13 June 2005
Statutory instruments
House of Lords
House of Commons

Proceeding contributions

Lord Davies of Oldham | 673 c184-6GC (Link to this contribution) That is a moot point. I may be tempted to stray too far. I produced my historical allusion to the lo...
Lord Berkeley | 673 c184GC (Link to this contribution) I simply want to ask my noble friend whether he thinks that the Russians’ signing COTIF or not would...

Show all contributions (9)
Lord Davies of Oldham | 673 c184GC (Link to this contribution) Of course. My noble friend is going to be put me right on that, I am sure.
Lord Berkeley | 673 c183-4GC (Link to this contribution) I declare an interest as chairman of the Rail Freight Group. Everyone welcomes this revised COTIF se...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 673 c184GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for all contributions to the debate and the general statements of principle, although ...
Baroness Hanham | 673 c181-2GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for that clear explanation of the regulations. I was inspired to hear that he d...
Earl of Mar and Kellie | 673 c182-3GC (Link to this contribution) I thank the Minister for explaining the order. We are generally content with it. The COTIF agreement...
Lord Davies of Oldham | 673 c179-81GC (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Railways (C...
Back to top