UK Parliament / Open data

Health and Social Care Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills on Health and Social Care Bill.
My Lords, so near, yet so far. Amendment 42 is very simple. It requires the Secretary of State to include in his mandate to the national Commissioning Board the requirement to set out two things. First, "““the priority and scope for … service redesign and reconfiguration””," in the NHS, "““in the light of the best clinical advice available””," and secondly, "““the priority and scope for transferring resources to adult social services to improve service integration and achieve best value for health services””." These are two big issues for the NHS and how it meets the Nicholson challenge of £20 billion of savings by 2015 and how it improves service integration. The proposals in this amendment are very much in line with the recommendations of the Health Select Committee in its two recent reports on public expenditure and social care, which were mentioned on the last group of amendments. As the Public Expenditure report said on page 30: "““The Nicholson Challenge can only be achieved through a wide process of service redesign on both a small and large scale””." It went on to say, "““we are concerned that savings are being made through 'salami-slicing' existing processes instead of rethinking and redesigning the way services are delivered””." Since I put this amendment down, I am pleased to say that the Minister has responded in a most constructive way. On the first part of the amendment, regarding service reconfiguration, he has entered into most constructive discussions on this issue and the related Amendment 217 in my name and the names of the noble Lord, Lord Patel, and the noble Baroness, Lady Williams, regarding a pre-failure regime. The Minister has undertaken to have an alternative to that amendment prepared before Third Reading. I would be glad to hear more today on how that work is progressing. On the second prong of the amendment, the Minister has had prepared an alternative approach for transferring money from the NHS to adult social care by amending Schedule 4. This gives the Secretary of State power to direct the board to make payments for community services, which, I understand, include adult social care. This is Amendment 148B, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Murphy. It would have been in my name as well if I had not been dallying in India when the noble Earl wanted to discuss it with me. I am very supportive of that amendment on the assumption that, as drafted, it is wide enough to cover adult social care, because that term is not mentioned specifically, and on the assumption that there are no vires issues with the Treasury on the matter of using NHS money for social care. Perhaps the Minister could provide some assurances on this when he responds. These issues are important for the NHS and for patients in the particular financial and demographic challenges that services face. I am pleased with the Government's constructive response. In the mean time, in order that we may debate these issues, I beg to move Amendment 42.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

735 c1098 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top