It would be consistent with what the noble Lord has just said if a claim could be made without the claimant having had to have moved out of the accommodation. The claimant might wish to do that and be in the process of trying to move on. I am not sure how this is framed in the primary legislation and maybe that is where the problem lies. The prohibition seems to relate to living at the same address at the point when the claim is made, but that might just be a temporary transitional arrangement as someone seeks to move on for obvious reasons.
Jobseeker's Allowance (Domestic Violence) (Amendment) Regulations 2012
Proceeding contribution from
Lord McKenzie of Luton
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 February 2012.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Jobseeker's Allowance (Domestic Violence) (Amendment) Regulations 2012.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
735 c81GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 20:51:17 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_812159
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_812159
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_812159