UK Parliament / Open data

Protection of Freedoms Bill

Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2012. It occurred during Debate on bills on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
25: Clause 27, page 20, line 4, leave out from ““section”” to ““if”” and insert ““26(1A) and (2), the relevant authority is not required to notify a parent, or obtain the consent of a parent,”” 26: Clause 27, page 20, line 8, leave out ““to give consent”” and insert ““to object or (as the case may be) consent to the processing of the child’s biometric information”” 27: Clause 27, page 20, line 10, after ““to”” insert ““notify the parent or (as the case may be)”” 28: Clause 27, page 20, line 11, at end insert— ““(1A) A notification under section 26(1A) must be given in writing, and any objection to the processing of a child’s biometric information must be made in writing.”” Amendments 25 to 28 agreed. Clause 28 : Interpretation: Chapter 2 Amendment 29 Clause 28 : Interpretation: Chapter 2 Amendment 29 Moved by

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

734 c1542 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Lords chamber
Back to top