Protection of Freedoms Bill

Does the noble Baroness accept that this is not a ““rather than”” situation? She keeps using the phrase ““rather than””. Of course we all want to protect ourselves against disorder and crime, but it is not a question of ““rather than”” but of balance. The Joint Committee on Human Rights has been looking at Marper and at the evidence and as an all-party and beyond-party committee it came to the conclusion that the balance was correct. Does the noble Baroness accept that it is a question of balance?