My Lords, thank you for that short and focused discussion. On the specific point about the interlinkage of Clause 5(1) and Clause 5(3), I think that my noble friend Lord Goodhart has answered the question. Frankly, if the amendment had come forward again, in the Christmas spirit I and the Government might have accepted it. For goodness’ sake, I hope that it is now too late to table a handwritten amendment, but it was a fine bit of drafting either way.
I would rather stay with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, in welcoming the importance of this small but targeted measure. I echo my thanks to him as chairman of our committee under this special procedure, to the Law Commission, and in particular to the commissioner, David Hertzell. I will not say that I wish I did not have to deal with more Law Commission matters because your Lordships may have seen the fourth, topical Question tomorrow morning, which touches on recent Law Commission work on intestacy. As the Question refers to inheritance tax, it is down to me, so I cannot escape Law Commission matters even this week.
Amendment 1 agreed.
Clause 3 : Reasonable care
Amendment 2
Clause 3 : Reasonable care
Amendment 2
Moved by
Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill [HL]
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Sassoon
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 December 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Bill [HL].
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c1749-50 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberLibrarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 14:35:31 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_797139
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_797139
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_797139