My Lords, after four speeches in favour of Amendment 80, the amendment still appears both overprescriptive and unnecessary. I say ““unnecessary”” in the light of the proposed new subsection (5B)(a) to the 2005 Act, which appears at the top of page 37 of the Bill. It lists, "““spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils””."
As if that were not enough, proposed new subsection (5B)(b) talks about, "““the needs of the range of pupils””,"
in the school. In addition, the chief inspector and all the other Ofsted inspectors will have to take account of the guidance already issued by the Secretary of State in July 2000. Finally, if this amendment were to be accepted, it would seem to fly completely in the face of the policy of localism quite rightly adopted by this Government.
Education Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Hylton
(Crossbench)
in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 26 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Education Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c819 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 13:51:54 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778402
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778402
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_778402