In that case, I somewhat misunderstood the Minister’s reply, from which it appeared to me that there was some doubt as to whether someone involved in those networks would end up with a higher penalty. I think that she said that you can charge people only with the offence that they have committed. That rather suggested that she felt that it might not be possible to charge them with any offence other than the one in the Bill, under which a £20,000 fine is the limit.
However, if the Minister is saying that where someone is apprehended who has been involved in running a network—and is the kind of individual who is seeing the ability to get ““easily into seven figures”” with money that could then be used ““for other illegal acts””—she would normally expect that such individuals would probably be charged with some other offence carrying a custodial sentence, that would certainly meet the point that I am making and the concern that I am expressing. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment 6 withdrawn.
Amendment 7
Moved by
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rosser
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c242-3GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:07:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777972
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777972
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777972