My Lords, I will of course withdraw my amendment, but I am a little disappointed with the Minister’s response. I was hoping that her response would be along the lines of saying that those who were clearly the brains behind the networks would almost certainly be charged with some other offence that would enable a custodial sentence to be imposed, if they were—to quote the assistant commissioner—people who, "““see that they are easily into seven figures and it is money that they will then use for other illegal acts””—[Official Report, Commons, London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill Committee, 17/5/11; col. 49.]."
I certainly do not advocate a custodial sentence for the individual in the pub or on the street who sells a very small number of tickets and is not part of an organised network. However, when an assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police turns up at the Committee in the other place and talks in terms of ““organised criminal networks””, ““easily into seven figures”” and money that will be used ““for other illegal acts””, I stand by my view and seriously question whether a £20,000 fine is sufficient.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Lord Rosser
(Labour)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c242GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:07:42 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777970
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777970
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777970