4: Clause 2, page 7, leave out lines 35 to 41 and insert ““after subsection (2) insert—
““(2A) But if, in relation to regulations under section 25 other than the first regulations, the Secretary of State considers that by reason of urgency it is necessary that they be made without being approved in draft—
(a) subsection (2)(b) does not apply to the regulations, and
(b) the regulations are instead subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.””””
5: Clause 2, page 8, line 7, leave out from ““case”” to end of line 13 and insert ““, for subsections (2) and (2A) there were substituted—
““(2) Regulations under that section are subject to the affirmative procedure.
(2A) But if, in relation to regulations under that section other than the first regulations, the Scottish Ministers consider that by reason of urgency it is necessary that they be made without being approved in draft—
(a) subsection (2) does not apply to the regulations, and
(b) the regulations are instead subject to the negative procedure.””””
Amendments 4 and 5 agreed.
Clause 2, as amended, agreed.
Clause 3 : Increase of maximum fine
Amendment 6
Clause 3 : Increase of maximum fine
Amendment 6
Moved by
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Garden of Frognal
(Liberal Democrat)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 25 October 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills
and
Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c236GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 21:08:14 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777957
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777957
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_777957