I have been told by my experts behind me that it will be shortly afterwards.
The noble Baroness, Lady Royall, reminded us of the effectiveness of the regulators. The principal regulator approach will not mean less effective regulation. It will be entirely valid to use different models of regulation to fit the circumstances so that we end up with smarter regulation that maintains trust and confidence in charities. Using an existing regulator’s processes and procedures to oversee charity compliance avoids costly and wasteful duplication.
The noble Baroness asked also about free schools. Free schools are a type of academy. They are charities in the same way as other academies. She asked also about the MOUs between the Charity Commission and principal regulators. MOUs will be published on the Charity Commission website. We are happy to deposit copies in the House Library.
I suspect that I have not given satisfactory answers to my noble friends who are experts in this area. I hope that they can be assured that I will provide written responses to questions to which they feel they have not answers.
The regulations are about making the system leaner and smarter. I therefore commend them to the House.
Motion agreed.
Charities Act 2006 (Principal Regulators of Exempt Charities) Regulations 2011
Proceeding contribution from
Baroness Verma
(Conservative)
in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 July 2011.
It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Charities Act 2006 (Principal Regulators of Exempt Charities) Regulations 2011.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c94GC Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand CommitteeRelated items
Subjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 20:55:40 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756772
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756772
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756772