UK Parliament / Open data

Education Bill

Proceeding contribution from Ian Mearns (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 11 May 2011. It occurred during Debate on bills on Education Bill.
It is also a concern that the decision to abolish the EMA in the first place was based on flawed evidence from a survey that was conducted in school sixth forms but not in further education colleges. That fact in itself shows that Ministers got the whole message wrong. In 2009-10, 567,000 youngsters received the EMA at the higher level—£30 a week—yet Ministers have decided to do away with it, based on evidence from youngsters in sixth forms but not in FE colleges. In my area of Gateshead, 67% of youngsters attending the local college were entitled to the EMA at the higher level.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

527 c1247 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top