I am inclined to remark in parenthesis that although my hon. Friend is not a member of the established Church, we all feel that he probably ought to be were it not for the minor question of doctrine.
On the ““notwithstanding”” clause, I was tempted to put one in, but I did not for two reasons: first, because I contend that my Bill falls on the right side of the jurisprudence I have been talking about within the European legal system, and secondly because my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister tends to get the heebie-jeebies when the word ““notwithstanding”” is mentioned. As I was praying him in aid, as well as the two Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Ministers who have given their support by signing the previous, identical version of the Bill, it seemed to me not a politic thing to do.
Food Labelling Regulations (Amendment) Bill
Proceeding contribution from
Richard Bacon
(Conservative)
in the House of Commons on Friday, 1 April 2011.
It occurred during Debate on bills on Food Labelling Regulations (Amendment) Bill.
About this proceeding contribution
Reference
526 c702 Session
2010-12Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamberSubjects
Librarians' tools
Timestamp
2023-12-15 15:51:32 +0000
URI
http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_733542
In Indexing
http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_733542
In Solr
https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_733542