UK Parliament / Open data

European Union Bill

The Committee will have to wait to see how we will decide to vote. I should like to finish the point about judicial reviews. Why do the explanatory notes refer to the so-called safeguard of judicial review on no fewer than four occasions? The reason is obvious: it is an attempt by the Government to give the wrong impression. It is yet another example of smoke and mirrors. The Minister has already promised to amend the woefully inadequate explanatory notes in one respect, but I urge him to rewrite them with regard to judicial reviews.

About this proceeding contribution

Reference

522 c51 

Session

2010-12

Chamber / Committee

House of Commons chamber
Back to top